Faculty Directory

Katherine McNeill

Program Director, Curriculum and Instruction, M.Ed.

Professor

Bryk Faculty Fellow

Department

TCS Teaching, Curriculum, and Society

Select Refereed Journal Articles

  • McNeill, K. L. Lowenhaupt. R., Cherbow, K. & Lowell, B. R. (in press). Professional development to support principals’ vision of science instruction: Building from their prior experiences to support the science practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching.
  • McNeill, K. L., Affolter, R., & Clinchot, M. (in press). Shifting from learning about to figuring out: PD resources to support classroom change. Science Scope.
  • Cherbow, K., McKinley, M.T, McNeill, K. L. & Lowenhaupt, R. (2020). Current k-8 science instruction: A systems analysis of the similarities and differences with the science practices. Science Education, 104(3), 446-478.
  • González-Howard, M., & McNeill, K.L. (2019). Teachers’ framing of argumentation goals: Working together to develop individual versus communal understanding. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(6), 821-844.
  • McNeill, K.L., Marco-Bujosa, L. M., González-Howard, M., Loper, S. (2018). Teachers’ enactments of curriculum: Fidelity to procedure versus fidelity to goal for scientific argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 40(12), 1455-1475.
  • McNeill, K. L. & Reiser, B. J. (2018). Open source for opening minds: New OpenSciEd materials support science standards. The Learning Professional, 39 (6), 44-48.
  • McNeill, K.L., Lowenhaupt, R., & Katsh-Singer, R. (2018). Instructional leadership and the implementation of the NGSS: Principals’ understandings of science practices. Science Education, 102(3), 452-473.
  • McNeill, K. L., González-Howard, M., Katsh-Singer, R. & Loper, S. (2017). Moving beyond pseudoargumentation: Teachers’ enactments of an educative science curriculum focused on argumentation. Science Education, 101(3), 426-457.
  • McNeill, K. L. & Berland, L. (2017). What is (or should be) scientific evidence use in K-12 classrooms? Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 54(5), 672-689.
  • McNeill, K. L., González-Howard, M., Katsh-Singer, R. & Loper, S. (2016). Pedagogical content knowledge of argumentation: Using classroom contexts to assess high quality PCK rather than pseudoargumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(2), 261-290.
  • McNeill, K. L. & Knight, A. M. (2013). Teachers' pedagogical content knowledge of scientific argumentation: The impact of professional development on k-12 teachers. Science Education, 97, 936-972.
  • McNeill, K. L. & Pimentel, D. S. (2010). Scientific discourse in three urban classrooms: The role of the teacher in engaging high school students in argumentation. Science Education, 94(2), 203-229.
  • McNeill, K. L. & Krajcik, J. (2009). Synergy between teacher practices and curricular scaffolds to support students in using domain specific and domain general knowledge in writing arguments to explain phenomena.  The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(3), 416-460.
  • McNeill, K. L., Lizotte, D. J, Krajcik, J., & Marx, R. W. (2006). Supporting students’ construction of scientific explanations by fading scaffolds in instructional materials. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(2), 153-191.

Select Book Chapters

  • McNeill, K. L. (2020). Integrating and supporting science practices in elementary classrooms. In Davis, E. A., Zembal-Saul, C. & Kademian, S. (Eds.). Sensemaking in elementary science: Supporting teacher learning. (pp. 87-94) New York, NY: Routledge.
  • González-Howard, M., & McNeill, K.L. (2019). Supporting linguistically diverse students in scientific argumentation across writing and talking. In Spycher, P. & Haynes, E. (Eds.). Culturally and linguistically diverse learners and STEAM: Teachers and researchers working in partnership to build a better path forward. (pp. 77-94). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
  • Loper, S., McNeill, K. L. & Goss, M. (2018). Developing multimedia educative curriculum materials to support middle school science teachers' PCK for argumentation. In Uzzo, S. M., Graves, S., Shay, E., Harford, M, & Thompson, R. (Eds.). Pedagogical Content Knowledge in STEM. (pp. 241-264) New York, NY: Springer.
  • McNeill, K. L., Berland, L. K. & Pelletier, P. (2017). Constructing explanations. In Schwarz, C., Passmore, C., Reiser, B.J. (Eds.). Helping students make sense of the world using next generation science and engineering practices. (pp. 205-228) Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association Press.
  • Berland, L. K., McNeill, K. L., Pelletier, P. & Krajcik, J. (2017). Engaging in scientific argumentation. In Schwarz, C., Passmore, C., Reiser, B.J. (Eds.). Helping students make sense of the world using next generation science and engineering practices. (pp. 229-258) Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association Press.

Books

  • Zembal-Saul, C., McNeill, K. L., & Hershberger, K. (2013).What’s your evidence? Engaging k-5 students in constructing explanations in science. New York, NY: Pearson Allyn & Bacon.
  • McNeill, K. L. & Krajcik, J. (2012). Supporting grade 5-8 students in constructing explanations in science: The claim, evidence and reasoning framework for talk and writing.  New York, NY: Pearson Allyn & Bacon.

EXPERTISE/INTERESTS

  • Science education
  • Science practices
  • Argumentation explanation
  • Design of learning
  • Environments for students
  • Teachers and instructional leaders