If we better understood what happens inside students鈥 brains as they listen to lectures and complete assignments, would instructors be able to teach more effectively?

Lynch School researchers are investigating this question with the help of electroencephalography (EEG), a neuroimaging tool that measures electrical activity in the brain.

Assistant Professor Ido Davidesco, who joined the Lynch School in 2024 and leads the Lab-to-Classroom Research Group, uses portable EEG devices to study collaborative learning among high school and college students in classroom settings. Augustus Long Professor of Education Marina Bers, who leads the Lynch School鈥檚 , is launching an EEG study this fall to understand the neurology of how elementary students learn computer coding. These researchers look forward to collaborations that will combine their interests, leveraging Davidesco鈥檚 training in cognitive neuroscience and Bers鈥 expertise in computer science education.

Literacy and the coding brain

August 11, 2022 -- Marina Bers, Augustus Long Professor of Education, Department of Formative Education at 艾可直播 College's ?Carolyn A. ?and ?Peter S. ?Lynch School of Education and Human Devolopment.

Marina Bers

For Bers, it鈥檚 important to conceive of coding as another form of literacy. 鈥淲hen you鈥檙e reading and writing, you鈥檙e using a traditional literacy,鈥 she says. 鈥淚t has grammar and syntax, symbols鈥攁nd you鈥檙e using that to communicate to others. When you code, it鈥檚 the same thing. You鈥檙e learning a symbolic system to represent an abstract concept so you can share it.鈥

Framing coding as literacy has neurological implications as well: decades of research have identified the types of brain activity associated with the production and processing of language. Bers is keen to know if that same brain activity is associated with coding. Her lab is planning a study that will use portable EEG devices to record children鈥檚 brain activity as they code with ScratchJr, a programming language for five- to seven-year-olds that Bers helped develop.

Bers has been researching the cognitive and neurological processes involved in coding since 2018, and she now believes that with EEG she has found the right tool for answering her research questions. Her previous studies used other imaging technologies that turned out not to be well-suited to the purpose, she says. (fMRI) required subjects to lie still, which limited the tasks they could do during the experiment. A study using聽functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) produced noisy data that was too difficult to analyze. Bers is optimistic that portable EEG devices will strike the right balance between providing useful data and allowing children to code in an environment that resembles normal classroom conditions.

Bers鈥 lab is planning a study that will use portable EEG devices to record children鈥檚 brain activity as they code with ScratchJr, a programming language that she helped develop.

The research could help her lab create better curricula and tools for teaching coding. 鈥淔or example,鈥 she says, 鈥渨e might learn what aspects of ScratchJr require more focused attention or more teaching time, and what level of alphabetical literacy is more conducive to learning to code.鈥

If the research shows that children鈥檚 brains process traditional literacy and coding similarly, that could also lead to wider use of coding in different subjects. 鈥淭raditionally, people have introduced coding as part of STEM鈥攕cience, math, engineering, and technology,鈥 she says. 鈥淏ut maybe we should integrate coding throughout the curriculum, like we do with reading and writing.鈥

Learners on the same wavelength

Ido Davidesco

Ido Davidesco

For a聽聽published last year, Davidesco and his colleagues placed groups of four college students and a lecturer in a simulated classroom and used EEG to record all participants鈥 brain activity. The researchers analyzed the EEG data to see when and how well the brain waves of participants aligned, a phenomenon known as brain-to-brain synchrony. The researchers tested students on the content of the lecture before, immediately after, and one week after the lecture. Comparing students鈥 answers to the test questions with the EEG data showed that students learned the most at times during the lecture when their brain waves were synchronized鈥攚hen the students were, literally, on the same wavelength.

In a follow-up study, Davidesco explored the impact of brain activity among students working in collaborative teams. He asked groups of high school biology students to wear EEG devices as they worked together to build a model of a cell. As he and his research team analyze data from the experiment, they鈥檙e looking at how student engagement varies throughout the task. They鈥檙e also comparing observations of student behavior with the EEG data鈥攍ooking to see if students who appear engaged or disengaged actually are.

In another aspect of the study, the researchers are comparing brain synchrony and students鈥 self-reported measures of social closeness. One of Davidesco鈥檚 preliminary findings is that friends displayed higher brain-to-brain synchrony during the task than did students who were only acquaintances. He hopes this study and future ones will improve teachers鈥 approaches to collaborative learning.

Davidesco explored the impact of brain activity among students working in collaborative teams. One聽preliminary finding is that friends displayed higher brain-to-brain synchrony during the task than did students who were only acquaintances.

鈥淲e know that collaborative learning overall is quite effective,鈥 he says, but not all students benefit equally. Studying students鈥 brain activity in classrooms might provide a deeper understanding of why some benefit from collaborative work more than others do. 鈥淔or instance, we know that efficacy has a lot to do with how you place students in groups, and yet there is controversy about how this should be done. Do we want groups that are relatively homogeneous or heterogeneous? Do we want to let students pick their own partners鈥攚hich they often want鈥攐r is it better for the teacher to assign students to groups?鈥

EEG studies may help teachers better understand how to create student groups where everyone is learning more together than they would learn on their own.

Future research

Thus far, all of Davidesco鈥檚 research has been with older students, and he hopes to expand this research through collaborations with Bers. Together, they plan to investigate how brain-to-brain synchrony affects the way young students learn to code when working in collaborative groups鈥攑erhaps assigning students to a variety of two-person teams to see how different pairings affect synchrony and learning.

鈥淚do has a solid background in cognitive neuroscience,鈥 says Bers. 鈥淚 have a solid background in computer science education, so he and I will be natural partners.鈥

Davidesco envisions many opportunities to make connections between neuroscience and education. The tools used in neuroscience research鈥攍ike EEG and eye-tracking鈥攈ave great potential to expand education research. 鈥淭he methods we tend to use in education research are limited in their temporal resolution, in the sense that we cannot just keep asking students every minute how engaged they are, because that by itself is distracting,鈥 he says. 鈥淲ith EEG, we get millisecond by millisecond readings of students鈥 brain data and, indirectly, their engagement level. I think that鈥檚 where things get really interesting because it allows us to ask more sophisticated questions.鈥

Davidesco would like to see more neuroscience research move from the laboratory to the classroom, where students can interact naturally and teachers can influence study design and implementation. 鈥淩esearchers can get input from teachers to make sure the questions they ask and the materials they鈥檙e using are relevant and can produce usable knowledge.鈥

Coming soon: M.A. in Learning, Design, and Technology

The Lynch School will soon begin accepting applications to a new master鈥檚 program launching in September 2025 that will train students to create, lead, and evaluate learning environments that incorporate cutting-edge technologies. Through project-based coursework, students will build portfolios in preparation for doctoral programs or for careers as learning experience designers, instructional designers, curriculum developers, and educational technology consultants.